Comey messed up

There’s been lots of chatter from both sides over the political spectrum about the actions of FBI Director James Comey in regards to Hillary Clinton’s email investigation.  When he had his press conference on July 5, 2016 announcing that there would be no prosecution, people on the right went crazy.   When he sent a letter to Congress last week, the left turned their anger up to 11.

I’ve watched this entire ordeal unfold with a bit of confusion.  If there was not going to be a prosecution, why would he need to have a press conference to announce that when that’s not the job of the FBI to do.  It’s usually the responsibility of the Attorney General or another member of the Dept. of Justice responsible for prosecuting crimes that holds those press conferences.  I’ve seen far too many to count, and I don’t recall any members of the FBI doing the speaking.  It’s usually the AUSA or some other lawyer.

Likewise, the letter sent to Congress was pretty much a note of hot air.  If you don’t know what you have, how do you determine whether to notify Congress or not?  Seems like there would need to be knowledge of what was contained in those emails to justify notifying Congress that you may have to continue the investigation.

I won’t try to ascribe political motivation to Comey’s actions, but I think he royally screwed the pooch on this one.  He’s either whipped up a fury right before the election over nothing, or he knows what is in those emails and had knowledge of that prior to getting a search warrant to see what’s inside.  The former action would seem like a violation of the Hatch Act, while the latter would possibly make any evidence obtained worthless in a court of law.  There’s also the memo that’s been passed down within the Dept. of Justice from the past few Attorney Generals that state they will not announce investigations of political figures less than 60 days before an election or something to that effect.

Maybe Comey felt that he was acting within the scope of his authority and felt he had no other choice.  I honestly don’t know.  I can say that, if it was my decision to make, I would not have sent that letter without concrete evidence that the found emails were indeed connected to the Clinton investigation.  That’s what makes me think the FBI knows what is contained within those emails.  If they’ve already read through them without a warrant, then they are inadmissible in any court proceeding as well as any information found from the information contained within those emails.  If the contents of the emails are indeed unknown, then there’s no point in notifying Congress about investigations because it’s not known whether the investigation will be impacted.

Either way, Comey messed up in my view, and what has already been an election for the history books just added another chapter.  As far as him being charged for violating the Hatch Act, I think that is a bit of a stretch at this point because there is no information to show motivation.  Now, if you wanna charge someone with violating the Hatch Act if it were indeed possible, I would submit Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) as the prime violator.  However, members of Congress cannot be charged under the Hatch Act as it only applies to employees under the Executive Branch.  I find it interesting that employees under the Legislative and Judicial branches are not covered, but that’s another topic for another post.


4 thoughts on “Comey messed up

  1. Did he ever! I’ve heard it speculated that he was trying to ward off pressure from Congress. Yeah? Well, he’s PAID to resist that pressure…so if that’s the reason, that’s a fail. I’ve also heard speculation that he was afraid if he tried to keep it quiet it would be leaked from within the FBI. Really? And who, exactly, is IN CHARGE of the FBI? Why, isn’t it Comey himself? So what kind of leader is he that he doesn’t seem capable of disciplining his subordinates? And, guess what, it got LEAKED anyway. So that’s a fail too.


    • That’s a bad way to fight off pressure. I’ve read that there was supposedly a “mutiny” within the FBI where people were resigning because of the July decision. I haven’t seen any of the people I know to confirm that. If that was an issue, I would have told them to quit and be gone. You can’t be an impartial investigator if you’re going to let your partisan views dictate your decisions.

      I’m glad that I don’t work under him because I’d have no faith in his decision making ability at this point.


  2. From where I stand if Comey broke rules then he knew what he was doing and he did not care. He just an AH working for the Right Wingers.
    He and his handlers in the Right had it all cooked up months ago. The Dems should have seen this coming. It is their fault for being lulled into a sleep about the rotten character of Comey.


    • I’ve heard that theory floated around, and while I think it has some merit, I think Comey’s motivation is more self-preservation than anything else. I could be wrong though as this particular election has basically broken the mold for elections.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.