It’s already June

I’ve been M.I.A. for a while.  Things got a bit busy, and I had to make adjustments in my time to ensure the important things got taken care of.  Something, I kinda wish politicians would do.

We’re coming up on a few important Supreme Court decisions that will have ramifications for the near term and quite possibly long-term direction of this country.  Decisions on the PPACA and same-sex marriage will produce cheering and jeering depending on which camp you belong in (if you have a camp).  No matter what the outcome though, the reverberations will be felt by all.

With same-sex marriage, the issue isn’t just marriage as most try to paint it.  It’s not even just a religious issue.  It boils down to probate law and issues involved there as well.  When a man and woman marry, their joint property gets settled by probate in the case one dies.  If a same-sex couple spends an entire lifetime together, their property rights mean absolutely nothing if one partner dies without the legal acknowledgment of their union.  Call it whatever you wish, but the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness doesn’t have a clause or asterisk that gives an exception to exclude people who happen to love someone of the same-sex.  I don’t know what the outcome will be, but I’m leaning towards thinking that the right for same-sex couples will be affirmed by the court.

On to the PPACA, otherwise known as Obamacare (I really loathe that term).

At question is the subsidies for insurance purchases made in the exchanges operated by the federal government in the states that opted to not set them up.  I kinda see both sides to this case.  On one hand, the states didn’t actually set up or operate the exchanges, so the law as written would suggest the subsidies are illegal.  From the opposite side, the federal government is operating the exchanges, but they are still state exchanges which could mean the subsidies are legit.

Part of me wants to see the subsidies struck down.  Since the law was passed, Republicans have done anything and everything they can to stymie or upturn the law.  If the subsidies are struck down now, it would be the result of active attacks by Republicans and conservatives, and it would be their responsibility to fix the system as they control both houses of Congress.  At the same time, the only people who would be affected right off would be the residents in the Republican led states that filed or joined suit.  Then, Republicans would have to go to their own constituents that voted them in and explain to them why they had to screw up their insurance coverage, and it would be a major screw up.  There would need to be something done immediately to rectify the chaos, and there’s no onus for the Dems to work with Republicans to fix it.  I see it as Wile E. Coyote catching the Road Runner and then not having a clue what to do next.

My realist side would prefer to see the subsidies upheld to put the fight to destroy this law to bed forever.  Instead of trying to destroy it, I’d prefer the same effort be used at straightening it out so that it’s functional and practical.  You would think that in one of the richest countries in the world, we would be able to provide basic preventative care for every citizen here.  In my view, there should be no question about that.  Beyond basic preventative care is a different topic and is up for debate.

Whatever the decisions made by the Supreme Court, there’s going to be winners and losers.  I guess we’ll have to wait to see who they are.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “It’s already June

    • Thanks, had a lot going on. We’re about to celebrate 15 years of marriage with a family and friends trip where we’re going to renew our vows.
      Been working hard to get things done. 🙂

      Like

  1. Very good point about probate law. We hear a lot about legal protections, but that one resonates.

    On PPACA, there’s a side that says let Republicans feel the heat for the repealing PPACA for some. But the real-world suffering so many would endure makes me hope the Court upholds the law. I just have no faith in Republicans in Congress to fix what they broke.

    (oh, and I have a facepalm request to you in at Jay’s place).

    Like

    • I’ve wondered why no talking heads have brought up the legal issues behind same sex marriage. I don’t see how anyone should be denied survivorship if they’ve spent their life sharing it with a long term partner.
      I don’t even recall any of the legal eagles talking about that angle.

      Like

  2. No one who has three little kids, two of them still in diapers, needs to apologize for not having time to blog.

    I hated the term Obamacare at first, but I’ve come to love it and use it every chance I get. Half-hearted and imperfect as it is, it’s still an effort by our government to make life better for ordinary American citizens. And our government very seldom does that these days. It’s Obama’s legacy, something concrete he accomplished in the face of implacable opposition. It’s only right that his name be on it.

    But if SCOTUS overturns the subsidy, what makes you think the Rs will own the damage? They’ll blame the Dems for the flaw in the bill. We’ll hear endless repetitions of “we have to pass it to see what’s in it” and how it was a secret vote in the middle of the night and all the Rs voted against it. That will be the narrative.

    On same-sex marriage, you’re absolutely right, it’s the probate and next-of-kin issues that really matter. Let’s hope Roberts understands.

    Like

    • They won’t own it, I don’t doubt that. However, there’s too much evidence against that argument to the point that those who will buy that story wouldn’t vote anything other than Republican anyway. It’s then incumbent upon everyone else to refute that argument as much as they try it.
      I don’t think Roberts wants to go down in history with such a fiasco under his watch. We’re going to find out soon enough.

      Like

  3. Probate law can be a nightmare, no matter who you are, which is why EVERYBODY should have a will……but I reckon some folks think that not making a will ensures that they won’t die.

    In my opinion, the PPACA is a complete mess and everybody really needs to just go back and lick that calf over………..but that ain’t gonna happen.

    Like

    • I need to update my will, but I’ve seen the necessity of having one with my own eyes.
      As for the health care, I agree with you that it’s pretty much done although I wouldn’t be opposed to smelting it down and recycling whatever is left.

      Like

  4. In addition to a will, I think everyone should also have a medical power of attorney & the person you name should know exactly what you want done/not done. This should be in addition to a DNR because not all medical practioners honor a DNR. Also make sure your doctors have copies of these documents. Went thru all this when I had surgery a couple of years ago.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s